31日Q&A:组队火炮乃是游戏分房的毒瘤

2016-06-02 23:50:10 神评论

17173 新闻导语

Q&A:游戏原创者之一对火炮大加嘲讽。

Rita忘记写题目了

Hello,

大家嚎~

Just finished translating a Q&A with my comrade Ctacello which was compiled by WoT Express (spasibo!), this Q&A was answered by Slava Makarov, one of the guys who created WoT and is now back on working for the company. For the sensitive ones, I warn you, there’s some cursing on this one.

Also, Happy Birthday Slava M.!

整合自WoT Express的Q&A,由WoT创始人之一Slava M.回答,另外祝Slava M.生快~

-We are seeking for solutions to fix the tier 10 SPG with tier 8 LT platoons (Platoon penalty) but a final decision hasn’t been made yet. Personally, I want arties out of platoons.

我们在寻求10级火炮和8级轻坦组队问题的解决方案,但还没最终决定。我个人的意见是组队不要带火炮

-I watched the statistics and Arties in platoons are one of the problems in MM. They are bullshit.

我看到统计数据中组队带火炮是分房系统的问题之一。真是x

-Developing a new MM is a high priority task. When we make model algorithms based on the types of vehicles and tiers existing in the game it’s only with arties in a platoon where we find issues.

开发一套新分房系统是优先度很高的工作。当我们基于战车类型和等级建立模型算法时只有带火炮的组队出了问题

-”What about 50vs50 battles?” -We have a prototype and looks okay.

 “50vs50如何了?”-我们建立了个原型系统,看起来还可以

-Player complains that LTs can no longer join MTs, TDs and HTs because of Platoon penalty. -“It’s not cool!” -This can be fixed with a couple tweaks and if we introduce special tier 10 scouts. We have some plans already but we are heavily discussing it still. We have some balancing problems with tier 10 LTs but if we make a new type of scouts it will work.

玩家抱怨轻坦由于组队惩罚不能跟MT TD和HT们组队玩耍了,“这可不cool!”

 -如果我们加入10级侦察车的话,这可以由一些调整修复。我们有一些计划,但仍在热烈讨论中。10级LT的平衡性上还有些问题,但如果我们加入一种新类型侦察车的话应该能解决

-”So you have blueprints on tier 10 LTS? If you approve them when we can see them in-game?” -”Pasholok has them.”

“所以你们有10级LT的蓝图?如果你赞成的话啥时候可以在游戏中见到?”

-“Pasholok(历史学家)有图”

-We need to refine the SPG role.

我们需要改进SPG的角色定位

-We don’t need Arties in Platoon.

 我们不需要在组队中带火炮

-So you think that arties in the platoon are a big problem but we only see arties in a platoon like in 5% of the battles. You are like “Quickly! Fix it!” But you are forgetting that the maps are shit, Light Tanks are dead as a class, with a fucking dispersion +/-25% that you won’t fix. -”What are you talking about? We are working as fast as we can on a new MM.”

“所以你认为组队带火炮是个大问题但我们能见到的组队带火炮大约只有5%,你们像是“赶快!修复!”但你们忘了地图也很糟,轻坦气息奄奄,还有你们不会修复的25%的随机区间。”

-蛤你在说啥?我们在尽快做个新分房系统

-”You must remake maps first.” -”We have plans to fix maps too.”

“你必须先重做地图”

-“正有此意”

-T-64 won’t be added to WoT, ever.

T-64永远不会加入WoT

–Why won’t you make a limit of 3 arties per team? -It’s not needed. It won’t fix the gameplay problem. You just need 2 skilled arty players for the game to be fucked. the best way to fix this is by denying arty from joining platoons. (RG: Wouldnt fix the problem but it would be an upgrade, to be honest, its 4-5 SPGs per team in a 15vs15 format gameis fucking ridiculous)

“为啥不能把两边火炮数量限制在3门?”

-没必要,并不会解决游戏性问题。只要有两个老鸟火炮这一场就会很糟,最好的修复方案就是拒绝火炮加入组队

-Veider told us that tier 9 and 10 Czechs are not overpowered, what are your plans if you have them for the Global Rebalance? -You don’t see many in the battles and they are not overpowered.

Veider说捷克9-10级车并不太强,整体重平衡时你们怎么计划怎么处理这俩车?

你不会在战斗中看到很多这些车,它们也不会太强

-”I can go now and fix 100 small bugs or make the Global Rebalance. You choose!”

“我可以现在走,修复100个小bug,或是做整体重平衡,你们选吧!”

-What about the personal missions for SPG and LT? -We need to remake those.

 “火炮和轻坦的个人任务咋办?”-会重做的

-Last 2 patches were okay, we are slowly improving.

上两个版本还可以,我们在缓慢改进

–Where were you and others who are working in the Global Rebalance 2 years ago, especially when shit hit the fan with Rubicon? -I wasn’t working in WoT so wasn’t allowed interfering, sorry. I convinced them to make repairs around in January (2016).

“两年前你们这帮搞整体重平衡的家伙都死哪去了,尤其是10.0给了玩家狠狠一击的时候?”

-当时坦克不归我管,我不被允许介入,抱歉。我直到16年1月才说服高层回来做修复

–The men who developed the game for the past 2 years left WG, so there is no way to ask them.

前两年管开发游戏的家伙已经离开了WG,所以问不到他了

以上信息译自StatusReport源地址:

/2016/05/30/12252/


【来源:】
日期
游戏
状态
下载
礼包

页游测试表

日期
游戏
状态
评分
礼包