超测服消息 毛子搞砸了50B的高清模型

Wargaming As Usual, 0.9.6 Edition

Posted on January 26, 2015 by Silentstalker — 6 Comments ↓

继5355悬空炮塔之后，毛子你们怎么又把HD AMX-50B搞砸了。

Hello everyone,

观众朋友们晚上好~

I have to admit, this is something that actually slipped through my net, because I simply did not believe that after the “M53/M55 flying turret” fiasco, Wargaming would screw around with model/collision model inconsistency again. But… check this out.

我（SS）不得不承认，有些东西从我的视线中溜了出去，因为我不太相信在5355磁悬浮炮塔的“惨败”之后，WG居然又搞砸了模型。碰撞模型再一次地不一致。我们来看看。

This is the AMX-50B HD model – a comparison between the visual and collision model. Look at the turret cradle (the part below the turret).

这是50B的高清模型——视觉模型和碰撞模型。看摇摆炮塔的下半部分：

超测服消息 毛子搞砸了50B的高清模型

As you can see, a significant part of the cradle is missing from the turret in the collision model, creating an exposed “strip” of armor. There’s one other mistake on the HD model, the hatches – the upper part of the hatches on the roof is missing from the collision model.

如你们所见，摇摆炮塔上下衔接处那个高度以及那一圈显著地“丢失”了，炮塔上部暴露出了一条脆弱的部分。还有一个错误，舱盖——车顶上舱盖上半部分在碰撞模型中做丢了。

超测服消息 毛子搞砸了50B的高清模型

Also notice the frontal plate shape difference between collision and visual model. Yes, there is a hole on the side of the armor.

还有，注意前装甲形状在视觉模型和碰撞模型中的不同。是的，在装甲的侧面有一个坑。

Why am I posting this – after all, it’s still 9.6 test, right? To catch the bugs and all that? Well, last time this happened, it went live with such a bug (again, the “flying turret”) and the results you probably know.

为什么我要发布这个？这不还是在9.6测试中么？要找到9.6所有的bug？Well，上次这种事就发生了，带着重大的bug就给人玩去了（还是那个磁悬浮炮塔的梗），结果你们都懂的。

Well, I guess I’ll have to go over models again to check for this kind of pitfalls.

SS还会去看这些模型，继续找这些缺陷。

译者：再次向SS这样有良心的人致敬。另外我倒是觉得这炮塔座圈前部碰撞模型明显小于视觉模型。