E100坦克歼击车不会被替换
17173 新闻导语
19.1.2015PostedonJanuary19,2015bySilentstalker—81Comments↓-JagdpanzerE-100willnotbeswitchedfor“somethingreal”–andthereisnoincentivetodoso,th
19.1.2015
Posted on January 19, 2015 by Silentstalker — 81 Comments ↓
- Jagdpanzer E-100 will not be switched for “something real” – and there is no incentive to do so, the vehicle is fine
白兔不会用其它真实存在的车去替换—— 没啥必要,这车挺好
- various branches (SS: specifically German TD’s mentioned) will not be reworked in order to have all the vehicles in them with the same playstyle (SS: basically, the player wants to switch the TD’s around so the entire branches get a specific “character” – this will not happen, with existing branches anyway)
不会为了让所有车玩法一样就去重做那些不同的分支(尤其是德系TD)(SS:总的来说,玩家们想去换掉TD,这样整个分支都会有特色,不过这事不会发生的,至少现有的是这样)
- T30 will not be “returned” to the heavy tank branch
T30不会再次回到重坦线
- KV-4 will not lose its unhistorical top gun
KV4不会失去它的非史实顶级炮
- why was LT buff done the way it was in 9.6? “No comment”
9.6 轻坦为什么以这种方式加强?不予置评
- tier 8-10 penetrantion nerf of some vehicles was not yet decided (it’s not clear how WG will do it)
部分8到10级车穿深削弱还未决定
- the historicity of gun penetration is less important than the importance of the gun (vehicle) being balance gameplay-wise
在平衡游戏的玩法上,炮的史实穿深的重要性没有炮本身以及车辆重要
- damaging external modules does not count as damage done in battle, only damaging the main tank hitpoints does
对附加模块的伤害不计算在内,只有伤害到车辆主体还会造成血量
- IS-7 has historical armor, E-100 didn’t have a turret in real life and that’s why the turret thickness can be balanced however WG wants, Maus armor is based on research of Yuri Pasholok, who said that the values could be different and 200+
IS7的装甲是符合历史的,E100现实中没有炮塔,这就是为什么炮塔厚度WG想怎么平衡就怎么平衡,老鼠装甲是基于Yuri的研究,他说这个数值有差别,但肯定200+
- the FV215b (183) armor buff in 0.9.5 is “based on historicity” (SS: wut?)
FV215b(183的)的装甲是基于”历史的数据“
- Storm states that a player proposal to reduce scout tank hitpoints while compensating that with improving other characteristics (camo, mobility) would only result in unrealistic (“UFO”) tanks
Storm表示玩家提议降低侦查车血值,同时补偿其它参数,伪装、机动什么的,而这样的结果只会出现不符合现实的坦克
- the replacement for WT E-100 is not the twin 128mm “Flakzwilling” mount WT
WT E-100的替换不是双管128“Flakzwilling” 武器运搬车
- not only the Waffentr?ger line has balance problems, the earlier considered “Sturm” TD line (Brummb?r and Sturmtiger) has them as well
不仅WT线路有平衡上的问题,之前考虑过的”突击“TD线路也有。
关于的新闻
- (2025-11-27) 谁没收了它的175毫米主炮?
- (2025-11-27) 咸鱼翻身还是强者恒强?曾经的弱势坦克如今强度如何?
- (2025-11-24) 3连发重炮+大俯角铁头的它,新版本已经低调回归强者之位!
- (2025-11-24) 三环均伤排名第一的含金量!6个轮子的高机动狙击手无需多言
- (2025-11-24) 【超测前瞻】双发配火箭,强度要上天